Link to the original news post
This morning of the 18th of August, Speaker of the Senate Hmquestionable announced that the Senate had decided to impeach President Notcom’s Chief of Staff Moved with a two-thirds majority as required by the provisions in the Constitution. There was only one singular vote in the chamber opposing the impeachment, namely that of Senator Hmquestionable.
When taking a look at the Senate’s hearing into the impeachment, it seems like the chamber ultimately wasn’t that interested in the matter at all, perhaps explaining the many abstentions during the impeachment vote. During the two days the impeachment hearing lasted, not a single question was posed to President Notcom or Chief of Staff Moved, a fact either explained by the Senate’s disinterest in the topic or by the clarity of special investigator Saket’s post-investigative report.
The report submitted to the Senate by the investigator came to the conclusion that there was clear and undeniable evidence of Moved having illegally abused alternative accounts to undermine the integrity of elections in the past. Saket ends his report saying he believed “this was concrete proof of the current Chief of Staff Moved doing shady stuff in the past”.
Following the Speaker’s announcement of the impeachment vote having passed the Senate, President Notcom decided to reappoint Moved to her position as Chief of Staff only six minutes later. Perhaps it is because of the Senate’s aforementioned disinterest in the topic that nothing has happened since that event: Moved simply went on to do her regular day-to-day work as Chief of Staff, after having stopped for a short break of not even ten minutes. Maybe she got herself a coffee in that time.